| I've
tried to live in the moment, but it hasn't worked out. Too much
pressure. I prefer to live for tomorrow. Or even better, the day
after tomorrow. It's in my nature to
put things off, and few things in life are as enjoyable as the
relief that comes from having got out of something I don't want
to do. The euphoria people experience from completing a marathon,
I get from cancelling a dental appointment.
But getting out of jury service is like
death: unavoidable. I received the summons - I was expected to
serve on one trial. It seemed as if I'd just completed jury service
and already I was up for it again?
"Some people get called more often
then others," my friend Michael said. Maybe I'm in the system
as someone who thoroughly understands the concept of reasonable
doubt. Next to my name it says: lives it daily.
A week later at 8.45am I showed up at the
court in Lower Manhattan. An announcement was made that anyone
who could not be available for the next two weeks should go to
room 139. I and half the room got up. Waiting in line wondering
if I'd be allowed to postpone, a woman tried to make small talk,
but I wasn't interested. I didn't need to hear about how she'd
booked her 25th-anniversary cruise and the tickets were non-refundable.
I had my own problems: I had to go to Montana.
My name was called by Joyce, a woman with
her own cubicle. "Why can't you serve?" she said. "Because,"
I paused, "I have to go to Montana." She raised her
eyebrows. "What date do you want to come back?" she
asked. I stared in disbelief. Nobody gets out of jury service
because they have to go to Montana. She was chewing her gum, waiting
for my answer. I thought she might like to be part of the decision.
Or even better, make it for me. Because
the only thing I enjoy more than getting out of something I don't
want to do is having someone make the decisions I don't want to
make.
"What date would you suggest?"
I asked. She shrugged. "Where will you be in September?"
Now I was having a crisis. I had no idea where I'd be. This line
of questioning was making me anxious. "How about October?"
she offered. I thought of saying I had to be in Laos, but I didn't
know that for sure.
Finally I said: "I can't get back to
you, can I?" I knew then I had a serious problem: I was busy
postponing a decision about when to postpone. So I took action.
"November!" I said defiantly. "Put me down for
November!" She continued chewing her gum. "Fine."
What was going on? That was too easy. I
wondered if I'd performed my duty so well the last time I did
service, there was a note to accommodate me as an act of gratitude.
During that trial I had turned the deliberations
into a scene from 12 Angry Men. Or, in my case, "9 Angry
Men, 2 Irritated Women and Me".
I decided it was probably best to leave
before she changed her mind.
At 9.45am I found myself with the whole
day ahead of me. I'd beaten the system; got a reprieve. But as
soon as I got outside and descended the courthouse steps, the
euphoria turned to regret. I should have got it over with. Finally,
I have a definitive plan for the future. And what is it? Jury
duty. |